Security and compliance
A findings list your engineers can actually work through.
Security reviews, cloud hardening, identity and secrets work, and compliance readiness. Ranked by exploitability, not by scanner severity.
A 400-item scanner export is not a security programme. It is a reason to stop reading. We review the system the way someone attacking it would, rank what we find by how reachable it is and what it would cost you, then help fix the top of that list. The rest goes in a backlog with an honest note about why it can wait.
What we ship
Everything under one roof.
Security review
Architecture, trust boundaries, and code, read by an engineer rather than a scanner.
Cloud hardening
Network, IAM, storage, and logging configuration brought to a defensible baseline.
Identity and access
SSO, least privilege, and session design, including the service accounts nobody owns.
Secrets and credentials
Detection, vaulting, and rotation, so a leaked key is already dead when it surfaces.
AI and agent security
Prompt injection, tool-use permissions, and data leakage in LLM features you ship.
Compliance readiness
The engineering work behind SOC 2 or GDPR: controls, evidence, and retention.
AI in the loop
Continuous review, not an annual PDF.
Exposure appears between reviews. Agents watch the gaps so a new problem reaches a human the week it appears.
Exposure agent
Tracks what is reachable from the internet as configuration changes.
- Trigger
- Runs nightly and after every infrastructure apply.
- Output
- A diff of newly reachable surface, with the change that caused it.
Secret scanner
Watches commits, build logs, and configuration for credential material.
- Trigger
- Runs on every push.
- Output
- An alert with the commit, plus a rotation checklist.
Reachability ranker
Filters dependency advisories down to code paths you actually execute.
- Trigger
- Runs continuously.
- Output
- A short upgrade list instead of a four-hundred-line export.
Prompt-injection prober
Attacks your own AI features with known injection and exfiltration patterns.
- Trigger
- Runs before launch and monthly after.
- Output
- Reproducible failing cases, worst first.
Every finding we hand over comes with a reproduction. If we cannot reproduce it, it is not a finding.
How we work
How the work actually runs.
- 01
Scope
What is in scope, what is off limits, and who to call. Agreed in writing first.
- 02
Review
Architecture, cloud configuration, identity, and code. Manual work, tools as support.
- 03
Rank
Findings ordered by exploitability and blast radius, each with a reproduction.
- 04
Fix
We work the top of the list with your team, then re-test what we changed.
Who we serve
Categories we already know.
- B2B SaaS
- Fintech
- Healthcare
- Legal
- Ecommerce
- AI products
What clients say
4.6average across 4 verified reviews
I was particularly impressed by their creative approach and attention to detail.
Videography & photography company · website, SEO + design
They delivered the project on time.
Watch retailer · Shopify store build
Cubitrek always had a positive mindset and was kind.
Personal training company · video + social media
Questions buyers ask us.
Not formal third-party testing. For a signed report your auditor or customer will accept, you want an independent firm that did not build the system. We do security reviews, hardening, and secure code review, and we can recommend testers.
No, and we will not imply otherwise. We do the engineering work that gets clients through their own audits: controls, evidence collection, logging, retention, and access reviews. Your auditor assesses you, not us.
We can get you ready. Certification needs an accredited auditor and an observation window, and no consultancy can shortcut that. We handle the technical controls and the evidence, which is where most of the work is.
A scanner tells you what it can detect. It cannot tell you that an internal endpoint trusts a header any user can set. Manual review finds the logic problems, and ranking makes the output something a team will actually work through.
This is the part most reviews miss. Agents that call tools introduce failure modes normal apps do not have: prompt injection through retrieved content, over-broad tool permissions, and data leaking into a model context. We test for all three.
Either. Most clients want us to work the top of the list with their team and leave the long tail to them. We re-test anything we changed, because a fix that was never verified is a belief, not a fix.
We stop and call you the same day, before it goes in a document. That escalation path is agreed during scoping so nobody has to work out who to ring while it is happening.
Ready to start security and compliance?
A 15-minute call. We map the goal, look at what exists, and come back with a scoped plan.